Résumés
Abstract
Objective – The primary purpose of this study was to better understand the nature of “reference” and reference transactions.
Methods – This study looked at four years’ of reference transaction (RT) data recorded at a small, state-owned university.
Results – The data clearly indicates that the overall number of RT continues to decline. It also reveals that, despite the use of student mentors, librarians are still involved with a majority of RT, regardless of whether or not they require the expertise of a librarian to resolve.
Conclusion – Continuing to be involved with RT which do not require the knowledge or training of a librarian (e.g., directional) can have a diminutive effect on the perceived role, work, and value of librarians. As such, it is suggested that these sorts of questions be addressed by student mentors or staff members. In turn, this will allow librarians to focus on those questions and activities which do require their unique knowledge and skills. Along similar lines, it is also suggested that librarians explore and identify new, non-traditional ways of applying their expertise to student success initiatives and the overall academic life of the institution. With the merger of three libraries, data from this study has been and continues to be used to make informed decisions about the provision of reference services in a new, integrated library environment.
Keywords:
- Reference,
- Reference Transactions,
- Reference Services,
- Academic Librarians,
- Reference Librarians,
- Statistics,
- roles
Veuillez télécharger l’article en PDF pour le lire.
Télécharger
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- American Library Association. (2008). Academic libraries in the United States statistical trends. ALA Office for Research & Statistics. http://www.ala.org/research/librarystats/academic/academiclibraries
- Bandyopadhyay, A., & Boyd-Byrnes, M. K. (2016). Is the need for mediated reference service in academic libraries fading away in the digital environment? Reference Services Review, 44(4), 596-626. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-02-2016-0012
- Banks, J., & Pracht, C. (2008). Reference desk staffing trends. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 48(1), 54-59. https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.48n1.54
- Bell, S. J. (2007). Who needs a reference desk? Library Issues: Briefings for Faculty and Administrators, 27(6). http://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/125
- Buss, S. P. (2016). Do we still need reference services in the age of Google and Wikipedia? The Reference Librarian, 57(4), 265–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763877.2015.1134377
- Carlson, S. (2007, April 20). Are reference desks dying out? The Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(33), A37–A39. https://www.chronicle.com/article/are-reference-desks-dying-out/
- Clark, K. T., Gabriel, H. M., & Borysewicz, K. (2020). Development, implementation and importance of an undergraduate peer research consultant program at the University of North Dakota’s Chester Fritz Library. Reference Services Review, 48(4), 579–600. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-05-2020-0036
- Cottrell, T. L., & Bell, B. (2015). Library savings through student labor. The Bottom Line, 28(3), 82-86. https://doi.org/10.1108/BL-05-2015-0006
- Detmering, R., & Sproles, C. (2012). Forget the desk job: Current roles and responsibilities in entry-level reference job advertisements. College & Research Libraries, 73(6), 543–555. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-304
- Eliot, C. (n.d.). Harvard-Radcliffe Online Historical Reference Shelf. Forty-Ninth Annual Report of the President of Harvard College: 1873–1874. https://iiif.lib.harvard.edu/manifests/view/drs:427074985$41i
- Ewing, K., & Hauptman, R. (1995). Is traditional reference service obsolete? The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 21(1), 3-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0099-1333(95)90144-2
- Ford, B. J. (1986). Reference beyond (and without) the reference desk. College & Research Libraries 47(5), 491-94. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl_47_05_491
- Freides, T. (1983). Current trends in academic libraries. Library Trends, 31(3), 457-474.
- Goss, H. (2022). Student learning outcomes assessment in higher education and in academic libraries: A review of the literature. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 48(2), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102485
- Green, S. S. (1876, November 30). Personal relations between librarians and readers. American Library Journal, 1(2-3), 74-81.
- Houston, A. (2016). What’s in a name? Toward a new definition of reference. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 55(3), 186–188. https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.55n3.186
- Johnson, A. M. (2018). Connections, conversations, and visibility: How the work of academic reference and liaison librarians is evolving. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 58(2), 91-102. https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.58.2.6929
- Keyes, K., & Dworak, E. (2017). Staffing chat reference with undergraduate student assistants at an academic library: A standards-based assessment. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 43(6), 469-478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2017.09.001
- Lenkart, J., & Yu, J. (2017). Specialized reference services at Illinois: Reference transactional analysis and its implications for service providers and administrators. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 56(4), 268-276. https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.56.4.268
- Lewis, D. W. (1995). Traditional reference is dead, now let’s move on to important questions. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 21(1), 10-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/0099-1333(95)90146-9
- Maloney, K., & Kemp, J. H. (2015). Changes in reference question complexity following the implementation of a proactive chat system: Implications for practice. College & Research Libraries, 76(7), 959–974. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.76.7.959
- Miles, D. B. (2013). Shall we get rid of the reference desk? Reference & User Services Quarterly, 52(4), 320-333. https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.52n4.320
- Reference and User Services Association: RUSA. (2008, September 29). Definitions of Reference. http://rusa.ala.org/blog/2008/01/31/rusa-approves-new-definition-of-reference/DocumentID:d42fff7a-8841-1ad4-c188-ee0259d6e7ad
- Ross, C. S., & Dewdney, P. (1998). Negative closure: Strategies and counter-strategies in the reference transaction. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 38(2), 151-163.
- Ryan, S. M. (2008). Reference transactions analysis: The cost-effectiveness of staffing a traditional academic reference desk, The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34(5), 389-399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2008.06.002
- Saint Clair, J. W., Aluri, R., & Pastine, M. (1977). Staffing the reference desk: Professionals or nonprofessionals? The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 3(3), 149-153.
- Shachaf, P. (2009). The paradox of expertise: Is the Wikipedia Reference Desk as good as your library? Journal of Documentation, 65(6), 977-996. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410910998951
- Sosulski, N. W., & Tyckoson, D. A. (2016). A reference for that: “What are we stopping?” And “what is shifting?” Reference & User Services Quarterly, 56(2), 87-90. https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.56n2.87
- Stevens, C. R. (2013). Reference reviewed and re-envisioned: Revamping librarian and desk-centric services with LibStARs and LibAnswers. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39(2), 202-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2012.11.006
- Summerhill, K. S. (1994). The high cost of reference: The need to reassess services and service delivery. The Reference Librarian, 20(43), 71-85. https://doi.org/10.1300/J120v20n43_07
- Weber, J. E., & Bowron, C. R. (2019). The evolving reference desk: If we scrap it, then what? Tennessee Libraries, 69(2). https://www.tnla.org/page/69_2_Weber