Résumés
Abstract
This paper will share Discover Palestine, an interdisciplinary Massive Online Open Course (MOOC) and the first MOOC to be created in Palestine, by the E-Learning Centre, Faculty from the Department of Geography, and Department of Tourism and Archaeology from An-Najah National University in Palestine. The paper traces the process of development of the Discover Palestine MOOC from its early inception as a cross institutional online course, to its current delivery and engagement with a global and diverse group of learners. Using a descriptive case study design and thematic analysis, the reflective experiences of four course team members involved as facilitators/designers in the design and delivery of the MOOC are shared. Three key themes, namely, “Informing pedagogies including delivery methods,” “A commitment to a national cause,” and “Teacher presence,” are presented and contextualized with data evidence. The findings share not only the hurdles the Discover Palestine team had to navigate during the MOOC development, but more importantly, how academic collaborations promoting open education practices offer powerful tools for the reciprocal exchange of knowledge, not least in shifting mindsets, and offering opportunities for shared fields of understanding to be realized in revealing creative, cultural practices, as well as lost histories.
Keywords:
- Palestine,
- MOOC,
- pedagogy,
- OpenMed
Veuillez télécharger l’article en PDF pour le lire.
Télécharger
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. The Online Learning Consortium. Retrieved from https://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/changingcourse.pdf
- Affouneh, S., & Raba, A. (2017). An emerging model of e-learning in Palestine: The case of An-Najah National University. Creative Education, 8, 189-201. doi: 10.4236/ce.2017.82016
- Anders, A. (2015). Theories and applications of massive online open courses (MOOCs): The case for hybrid design. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(6). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2185/35
- Bates, T. (2014). MOOCs: Getting to know you better. Distance Education, 35(2), 145-14. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2014.926803
- Bayne, S., & Ross, J. (2014). The pedagogy of the massive open online course: The UK view. Recuperado el: The Higher Education Academy, 30. Retrieved from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/hea_edinburgh_mooc_web_240314_1.pdf
- Braun V., & Clarke V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2) 77-101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Downes, S. (2012). Connectivism and connective knowledge: Essays on meaning and learning networks. National Research Council Canada. Retrieved from http://www.downes.ca/files/books/Connective_Knowledge-19May2012.pdf
- Gallagher, S., & Wallace, C. (2016). A far cry from school history: massive online open courses as a generative source for historical research. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(5). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2673/3882
- Gašević, D., Kovanović, V., Joksimović, S., & Siemens, G. (2014). Where is research on massive open online courses headed? A data analysis of the MOOC research initiative. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 5. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1954/3099
- Fischer, G. (2014). Beyond hype and underestimation: identifying research challenges for the future of MOOCs. Distance Education, 35, 2, 1-10. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2014.920752
- Laurillard, D. (2013). Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies. London, Routledge
- McAuley, A., Stewart, B., Siemens, G., & Cormier, D. (2010). The MOOC model for digital practice. elearnspace.org. Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/MOOC_Final.pdf
- Milligan, C., Littlejohn, A., & Margaryan, A. (2013). Patterns of engagement in connectivist MOOCs. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 149-159. Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol9no2/milligan_0613.htm
- Parr, C. (2015). MOOCS: Fluctuating rates in online investment. Times Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/moocs-fluctuating-rates-in-online-investment/2019816.article
- Poplar, D. (2014). MOOC evolution and one poetry MOOC's hybrid approach. Educause Review Online. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/mooc-evolution-and-one-poetry-mooc's-hybrid-approach/
- Selwyn, N. (2007). The use of computer technology in university teaching and learning: a critical perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(2), 83-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00204.x
- Simons, H. (2009). Case study research in practice. London: Sage.
- Terras, M. M., & Ramsay, J. (2015). Massive open online courses (MOOCs): Insights and challenges from a psychological perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3) 472-487. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12274
- Wimpenny, K., Merry, S.K., Tombs, G. & Villar-Onrubia, D. (Eds) (2016). OpenMed: Opening up Education i n South Mediterranean Countries: A Compendium of Case Studies and Interviews with Experts about Open Education Practices and Resources. OpenMed, ISBN 978-1-84600-0.
- Yuan, L., & Powell, S. (2013). MOOCS and disruptive innovation: Implications for higher education. Open Education Europa. Retrieved from http://publications.cetis.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/MOOCs-and-Open-Education.pdf