Résumés
Abstract
“How is society possible?” The mirror image of Simmel’s famous question is: “How is individuality possible?” To answer this question Simmel developed a philosophy and sociology of individualism. The “tragedy of individuality” consists of the hiatus between the social structure offering freedom and individuality and the culture unable to provide the necessary meaning and orientation. This is shown with respect to epistemic, structural, cultural and ethic individuality.
Veuillez télécharger l’article en PDF pour le lire.
Télécharger
Parties annexes
Biographical notes
Hans-Peter Müller has the chair of General Sociology at Humboldt-University Simmel unfortunately never got. His areas of research include classical and modern social theory, social inequality, culture and the conduct of life. With Tilman Reitz he publishes a “Simmel-Handbook” for Suhrkamp in 2018, the 150th anniversary of Simmel’s death.
Alessandro Cavalli is Professor of Sociology. He taught at the University of Pavia. He had been Max Weber Gastprofessor at the University of Heidelberg; L. Leclerq Professor at the Université Catholique de Louvain-la-Neuve; Fellow of the Collegium Budapest, Institute for Advanced Studies. Fields of interest: German social thought at the turn of 19th and 20th century, sociology of youth, time and education. He is author of more than 200 publications and member of the review boards of many journals, both Italian and foreign.
Alessandro Ferrara is Professor of Political Philosophy at the University of Rome Tor Vergata and former President of the Italian Association for Political Philosophy. Recently he has published Rousseau and Critical Theory (Boston-Leiden, Brill, 2017) and The Democratic Horizon. Hyperpluralism and the Renewal of Political Liberalism (Cambridge University Press, 2014).
Bibliography
- Coser R. L. (1991). In Defense of Modernity. Role Complexity and Individual Autonomy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- Durkheim É., Mauss M. (1901/2). “De quelques formes de classification. Contribution à l’étude des représentations collectives”, in: Année sociologique, 6, pp. 1-72.
- Fellmann, F. (1994). “Georg Simmels Persönlichkeitsbegriff als Beitrag zur Theorie der Moderne”, in: E.W. Orth, and H. Holzhey (eds.): Neukantianismus. Perspektiven und Probleme. Würzburg: Königshausen und Neumann, pp. 309-325.
- Goethe J. W. von (1820). “Urworte. Orphisch”, in: J.W. Goethe, Zur Morphologie, 1 (2), pp. 98-99.
- Goethe J. W. von (2003). Faust. 2 vols., “Texte” (a) and “Kommentare” (b) ed. by A. Schöne, Frankfurt/M.-Leipzig: Insel.
- Hesse. H. (1943). Das Glasperlenspiel. 2 vols. Zürich: Fretz&Wasmuth.
- Kant I. (1983)[1781]. “Kritik der reinen Vernunft”, in: Werke in sechs Bänden, vol. 2, ed. by W. Weischedel. Darmstadt: Wiss. Buchgesellschaft.
- Kippele F. (1998). Was heißt Individualisierung? Die Antworten der soziologischen Klassiker. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
- Isaksen Widding L. and Waerness M. (eds.) (1993). Individuality and Modernity. Georg Simmel and Modern Culture. Bergen: Sociology Press.
- Langbehn J. (anonymous) (1890). Rembrandt als Erzieher. Von einem Deutschen. Leipzig: C.L. Hirschfeld.
- Lovejoy A. (1936). The Great Chain of Being. A Study of the History of an Idea. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Müller H.-P. (1993). “Soziale Differenzierung und Individualität. Georg Simmels Gesellschafts- und Zeitdiagnose”, in: Berliner Journal für Soziologie, 3 (1), pp. 127-140.
- Müller H.-P. (2007). Max Weber. Eine Einführung in sein Werk. Köln-Weimar-Wien: Böhlau.
- Müller H.-P. (2010). “Goethe: The Ambivalence of Modernity and the Faustean Ethos of Personality”, in: C. Edling, and J. Rydgren (eds.), Sociological Insights of Great Thinkers. Sociology through Literature, Philosophy, and Science. Santa Barbara-Denver-Oxford: Praeger, pp. 169-176.
- Müller H.-P. (2015). “Wie ist Individualität möglich? Strukturelle und kulturelle Bedingungen eines modernen Kulturideals”, in: Zeitschrift für theoretische Soziologie, 4 (1), pp. 89-111.
- Müller H.-P., Reitz T. (2018) (Ed.). Simmel-Handbuch. Begriffe, Hauptwerke, Aktualität. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
- Pohlmann F. (1987). Individualität, Geld und Rationalität. Georg Simmel zwischen Karl Marx und Max Weber. Stuttgart: Enke.
- Pytthinen O. (2008). “Ambiguous Individuality: Georg Simmel and the ‚Who’ and the ‚What’ of the Individual”, in: Human Studies 31, pp. 279-298.
- Reckwitz A. (2017). Die Gesellschaft der Singularitäten. Zum Strukturwandel der Moderne. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
- Schroer M. (2001). Das Individuum der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
- Simmel G. (1971)[1908]. “How Is Society Possible?”, in: Simmel G., On Individuality and Social Forms, ed. and with an Introduction by D.N. Levine. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 6-22.
- Simmel G. (1987). Das individuelle Gesetz. Philossophische Exkurse, ed. by and with an Introduction by Landmann M.and newly ed. with an Afterword by Köhnke K.C. Frankfurt /M.: Suhrkamp.
- Simmel G. (1989a)[1890]. Über sociale Differenzierung, in: GSG 2, pp. 109-295.
- Simmel G. (1989b)[1900]. Philosophie des Geldes, in: GSG 6, pp. 1-787.
- Simmel G. (1990)[1900]. The Philosophy of Money, ed. by D. Frisby and translated by T. Bottomore and D. Frisby. 2nd. enlarged ed. London-New York: Routledge.
- Simmel G. (1992)[1908]. Soziologie. Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung, in: GSG 11.
- Simmel G. (1995a)[1901]. “Die beiden Formen des Individualismus”, in: GSG 7, pp. 49-56.
- Simmel G. (1995b)[1904]. “Kant und der Individualismus”, in: GSG 7, pp. 273-282.
- Simmel G. (1995c)[1906]. Kant und Goethe. Zur Geschichte der modernen Weltanschauung, in: GSG 10, pp. 119-166.
- Simmel G. (1995d)[1907]. Schopenhauer und Nietzsche. Ein Vortragszyklus, in: GSG 10, pp. 167-408.
- Simmel G. (1997)[1904]. Kant. Sechzehn Vorlesungen gehalten an der Berliner Universität, in: GSG 9, pp. 7-226.
- Simmel G. (1999a)[1890]. “Rembrandt als Erzieher”, in: GSG 1, pp. 232-242.
- Simmel G. (1999b)[1917]. Grundfragen der Soziologie, chapter 4, Individuum und Gesellschaft in Lebensanschauungen des 18. und 19. Jahrhundert (Beispiel der philosophischen Soziologie), in: GSG 16, pp. 122-149.
- Simmel G. (1999c)[1918]. Lebensanschauung. Vier metaphysische Kapitel, in: GSG 16, pp. 346-425.
- Simmel G. (2001a)[1912]. “Goethes Individualismus”, in: GSG 12, pp. 388-416.
- Simmel G. (2001b)[1913]. “Das individuelle Gesetz. Ein Versuch über das Prinzip der Ethik”, in: GSG 12, pp. 417-470.
- Simmel G. (2003a)[1913]. Goethe, in: GSG 15, pp. 7-271.
- Simmel G. (2003b)[1916]. Rembrandt. Ein kunstphilosophischer Versuch, in: GSG 15, pp. 305-515.
- Simmel G. (2010)[1918]. The View of Life. Four Metaphysical Essays with Journal Aphorisms, ed. and with an Introduction by D.N. Levine and D. Silver. Chicago-London: The University of Chicago Press.
- Susman M (1959). Die geistige Gestalt Georg Simmels. Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck.
- Watier P. (1993). “Simmel and the Image of Individuality”, in: Current Sociology, 4 (2), pp. 69-75.
- Wolff K. (Ed.) (1950). Georg Simmel 1858-1918, Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.
- Weber M. (1973)[1922]. Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre. 4th. Printing, ed. by J. Winckelmann. Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck.
Alessandro Cavalli's Bibliography
- Cavalli A. (2009). “Variationen über das Thema des Geheimnisses”, in: Simmel Studies, XIX, 1, pp.20-35.
- Simmel G. (1992[1899]). Zur Psychologie und Soziologie der Lüge. GSG 5, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp
Alessandro Ferrara's Bibliography
- Ferrara A. (2008). The Force of the Example. Explorations in the Paradigm of Judgment. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Simmel G. (1987[1913]). “Das individuelle Gesetz”, in: Das individuelle Gesetz. Philosophische Exkurse, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 174-230.