Résumés
Résumé
La gestion des administrations publiques fondée sur les résultats et la transparence est employée fréquemment par les politiciens et les fonctionnaires comme une façon de promouvoir l’efficacité et les idéaux de réforme destinés à transformer les organisations du secteur public (Hood, 1995, 1990). Le présent essai porte un regard critique sur l’explosion des pratiques de vérification au sein des organisations du secteur public afin de mieux comprendre comment ces changements ont été introduits dans les organisations publiques, de s’interroger sur leurs possibles effets involontaires et de souligner les risques d’une illusion de contrôle.
Abstract
Politicians and public servants have turned to managing by results and increased transparency, rather than policy options, as a way to promote efficiency and ideals of reformability – and ultimately to transform public sector organizations, as has been articulated by Hood (1995, 1990). This essay is therefore concerned with the explosion of audits in public sector organizations with a view to better understanding how change has been introduced within the public sector, questioning its possible unintended effects and highlighting the risks of an illusion of control.
Veuillez télécharger l’article en PDF pour le lire.
Télécharger
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- Broadbent, J. et J. Guthrie (2008). « Public Sector to Public Services: 20 Years of “Contextual” Accounting Research », Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, vol. 21, n° 2, p. 129-169.
- Brown, R. E. (2005). « Enron/Andersen: Crisis in U.S. Accounting and Lessons for Government », Public Budgeting & Finance, vol. 25, n° 3, p. 20-32.
- Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (2001). Beyond Compliance: Building a Governance Culture, www.ecgi.org/codes/documents/beyond_compliance.pdf (page consultée en juillet 2012).
- Carlin, T. M. (2005). « Debating the Impact of Accrual Accounting and Reporting in the Public Sector », Financial Accountability & Management, vol. 21, n° 3, p. 309-336.
- Clarke, F. et G. Dean (2007). Indecent Disclosure: Gilding the Corporate Lily, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
- Clatworthy, M., H. Mellett et M. Peel (2000). « Corporate Governance under “New Public Management”: An Exemplification », Corporate Governance: An International Review, vol. 8, n° 2, p. 166-176.
- Czarniawska, B. et G. Sevón (2005). « Translation is a Vehicle, Imitation its Motor and Fashion Sits at the Wheel », dans B. Czarniawska et G. Sevón (dir.), Global Ideas: How Ideas, Objects and Practices Travel in the Global Economy, Malmö, Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press.
- English, L. et P. Skaerbaek (2007). « Performance Auditing and the Modernization of the Public Sector », Financial Accountability and Management, vol. 23, n° 3, p. 239-241.
- Flottes, M. et Y. Gendron (2010). « Sarbanes-Oxley et l’indépendance des auditeurs : mouvance réglementaire et jeux de vérité », Comptabilité – Contrôle – Audit, vol. 16, n° 2, p. 7-29.
- Francis, J. R. (1994). « Auditing, Hermeneutics, and Subjectivity », Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 19, n° 3, p. 235-269.
- Free, C. et V. Radcliffe (2009). « Accountability in Crisis: The Sponsorship Scandal and the Office of the Comptroller General in Canada », Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 84, n° 2, p. 189-208.
- Gabe, J. (1995). « Health, Medicine and Risk: The Need for a Social Approach », dans J. Gabe (dir.), Medicine, Health and Risk: Sociological Approaches, Oxford, Blackwell.
- Gendron, Y., D. J. Cooper et B. Townley (2007). « The Construction of Auditing Expertise in Measuring Government Performance », Accounting, Organizations & Society, vol. 32, n° 1/2, p. 105-133.
- Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, Stanford, Stanford University Press.
- Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity, Stanford, Stanford University Press.
- Greenwood, R., R. Suddaby et C. R. Hinings (2002). « Theorizing Change: The Role of Professional Associations in the Transformation of Institutionalized Fields », The Academy of Management Journal, vol. 45, n° 1, p. 58-80.
- Hood, C. (2007). « What Happens When Transparency Meets Blame-avoidance? », Public Management Review, vol. 9, n° 2, p. 191-210.
- Hood, C. (1995). « The “New Public Management” in the 1980s: Variations on a Theme », Accounting, Organizations & Society, vol. 20, n° 2/3, p. 93-109.
- Hood, C. (1990). « A Public Management for All Seasons », Public Administration, vol. 69, p. 3-19.
- Hood, C. et G. Peters (2004). « The Middle Aging of New Public Management: Into the Age of Paradox? », Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, vol. 14, n° 3, p. 267-282.
- Hopwood, A. G. (1984). « Accounting and the Pursuit of Efficiency », dans A. G. Hopwood et C. Tonkins (dir.), Issues in Public Sector Accounting, Oxford, Philip Allan.
- Jackson, P. M. et T. E. Fogarty (2005). Sarbanes-Oxley for Nonprofits: A Guide to Gaining Competitive Advantage, Hoboken, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
- Lapsley, I. (2009). « New Public Management: The Cruellest Invention of the Human Spirit? », Abacus, vol. 45, n° 1, p. 1-21.
- Lapsley, I. (2008). « The NPM Agenda: Back to the Future », Financial Accountability & Management, vol. 24, n° 1, p. 77-96.
- Lapsley, I. et C. K. M. Pong (2000). « Modernization Versus Problematization: Value-for-money Audit in Public Services », European Accounting Review, vol. 9, n° 4, p. 541-567.
- Miller, P. et N. Rose (2008). Governing the Present: Administering Economic, Social and Personal Life, Cambridge, Polity Press.
- Morin, D. (2002). « Influence of Value for Money Audit on Public Administrations: Looking Beyond Appearances », Financial Accountability & Management, vol. 17, n° 2, p. 99-117.
- Ogden, S. (1997). « Accounting for Organizational Performance: The Construction of the Customer in the Privatized Water Industry », Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 22, n° 6, p. 529-556.
- OCDE (2005). Lignes directrices de l’OCDE sur le gouvernement d’entreprise des entreprises publiques, www.oecd.org/daf/corporateaffairs/soe/guidelines (page consultée en mars 2009).
- OCDE (2004). OECD Principles of Corporate Governance, www.oecd.org/dataoecd/32/18/ 31557724.pdf (page consultée en mars 2009).
- Parker, L. et G. Gould (1999). « Changing Public Sector Accountability: Critiquing New Directions », Accounting Forum, vol. 23, n° 2, p. 109-135.
- Pentland, B. T. (2000). « Will Auditors Take Over the World? Program, Technique and the Verification of Everything », Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 25, n° 3, p. 307-312.
- Power, M. (2009). « The Risk Management of Nothing », Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 34, n° 6-7, p. 849-855.
- Power, M. (2004). The Risk Management of Everything: Rethinking the Politics of Uncertainty, Londres, Demos.
- Power, M. (1997). The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
- Power, M. (1994). The Audit Explosion, Londres, Demos.
- Preston, A. M., D. J. Cooper et R. W. Coombs (1992). « Fabricating Budgets: A Study of the Production of Management Budgeting in the National Health Service », Accounting, Organizations & Society, vol. 17, n° 6, p. 561-593.
- Roberts, N. et P. J. Candreva (2006). « Controlling Internal Controls », Public Administration Review, vol. 66, n° 3, p. 463-465.
- Roe, E. (1994). Narrative Policy Analysis: Theory and Practice, Durham, Duke University Press.
- Strang, D. et J. W. Meyer (1993). « Institutional Conditions for Diffusion », Theory and Society, vol. 22, n° 4, p. 487-511.
- Tolbert, P. S. et L. G. Zucker (1996). « Institutionalization of Institutional Theory », dans S. Clegg, C. Hardy et W. Nord (dir.), Handbook of Organization Studies, Londres, Sage.
- Townley, B., D. J. Cooper et L. Oakes (2003). « Performance Measures and the Rationalization of Organizations », Organization Studies, vol. 24, n° 7, p. 1045-1071.
- Tremblay, M.-S. et Y. Gendron (2011). « Governance Prescriptions Under Trial: On the Interplay Between the Logics of Resistance and Compliance in Audit Committees », Critical Perspectives on Accounting, vol. 22, n° 3, p. 259-272.
- Vermeer, T. K., K. Raghunandan et D. A. Forgione (2006). « The Composition of Non Profit Audit Committees », Accounting Horizons, vol. 20, n° 1, p. 75-90.